United States v. Ralph Laverdure
This text of 384 F. App'x 637 (United States v. Ralph Laverdure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Ralph Neis Laverdure appeals from the 124-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Laverdure contends the district court erred by refusing to apply safety valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). This contention is unavailing because the district court properly concluded that Laverdure failed to truthfully provide to the government all information and evidence concerning the conduct for which he was convicted and sentenced. See § 3553(f)(5);- see also United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 F. App'x 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-laverdure-ca9-2010.