United States v. Ralph Laverdure

384 F. App'x 637
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 2010
Docket09-30205
StatusUnpublished

This text of 384 F. App'x 637 (United States v. Ralph Laverdure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ralph Laverdure, 384 F. App'x 637 (9th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Ralph Neis Laverdure appeals from the 124-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Laverdure contends the district court erred by refusing to apply safety valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f). This contention is unavailing because the district court properly concluded that Laverdure failed to truthfully provide to the government all information and evidence concerning the conduct for which he was convicted and sentenced. See § 3553(f)(5);- see also United States v. Ajugwo, 82 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
384 F. App'x 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-laverdure-ca9-2010.