United States v. Ralph Joseph Avendano, Jr.
This text of 455 F.2d 975 (United States v. Ralph Joseph Avendano, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction in this case involving two counts related to bank robbery and one count of use of a telephone for false threats is affirmed.
The double jeopardy argument is rejected under Haddad v. United States, 349 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 896, 86 S.Ct. 193, 15 L.Ed. 2d 153 (1965).
We find the evidence quite sufficient.
We find no abuse of discretion in permitting a confederate to testify out of order at the second trial and no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
455 F.2d 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-joseph-avendano-jr-ca9-1972.