United States v. Ralph Joseph Avendano, Jr.

455 F.2d 975
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 10, 1972
Docket71-2284
StatusPublished

This text of 455 F.2d 975 (United States v. Ralph Joseph Avendano, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ralph Joseph Avendano, Jr., 455 F.2d 975 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this case involving two counts related to bank robbery and one count of use of a telephone for false threats is affirmed.

The double jeopardy argument is rejected under Haddad v. United States, 349 F.2d 511 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 896, 86 S.Ct. 193, 15 L.Ed. 2d 153 (1965).

We find the evidence quite sufficient.

We find no abuse of discretion in permitting a confederate to testify out of order at the second trial and no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Samuel Shibli Haddad v. United States
349 F.2d 511 (Ninth Circuit, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
455 F.2d 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ralph-joseph-avendano-jr-ca9-1972.