United States v. Rajwani

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 2008
Docket18-60776
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Rajwani (United States v. Rajwani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Rajwani, (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED April 25, 2008 No. 07-10636 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

NINA K. RAJWANI,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 4:04-CR-174

Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nina Rajwani has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rajwani has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rajwani’s response discloses no nonfrivolous is- sue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-10636

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Rajwani, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rajwani-ca5-2008.