United States v. RAJMP, Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Case No.: 3:17-cv-515-AJB-DEB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING JOINT ) MOTION TO STAY AND v. ) ADMINISTRATIVE ) CLOSURE OF THE CASE RAJMP, INC.; JOAN M. POLITTE; ) MERRILL LYNCH BUSINESS; ) FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.; ) CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY; ) TBC CORPORATION; ) SC TELECOM, LLC; WELLS FARGO ) BANK, N.A.; PACIFIC WESTERN ) BANK; OUTFRONT MEDIA, INC.; ) HALLE PROPERTIES, L.L.C.; ) POFACO, INC.; COUNTY OF; ) SAN DIEGO; MIDAS REALTY ) CORPORATION; KELLY M.; ) POLITTE as the Personal ) Representative of the ESTATE OF ) ROBERT A. POLITTE; TED R. ) POLITTE as the Personal ) Representative of the ESTATE OF ) ROBERT A. POLITTE, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) Having considered the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 272), the record contained herein, and for good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Joint Motion is GRANTED; 2. This action is stayed. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. The decision to administratively close this case pending execution of the settlement agreement does not have any jurisdictional effect. See Dees v. Billy, 394 F.3d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 2005) (‘An order administratively closing a case is a docket management tool that has no jurisdictional effect.’’). 1] Dated: December 22, 2020 , Hon, Anthony J Heatia United States District Judge