United States v. Rainey

631 F. App'x 142
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2016·No. No. 15-7387·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie D. Rainey seeks to appeal district court’s order granting his motion to appoint counsel and to conduct a restitution hearing. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Rainey seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Rainey, 631 F. App'x 142 (4th Cir. 2016).

631 F. App'x 142 (United States v. Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)