United States v. Rainey

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Rainey

21 F. App'x 173

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rainey. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 F. App'x 648 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2001·No. 01-6879·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Quinton Rainey appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions to re *174 consider the denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions disclose no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. CR-94-69 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2001; May 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Quinton Rainey appeals from the district court’s orders denying his motions to re *174 consider the denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinions disclose no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Rainey, No. CR-94-69 (E.D.Va. Apr. 19, 2001; May 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Rainey, 21 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

21 F. App'x 173 (United States v. Rainey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related