United States v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.

16 Cust. Ct. 339, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 466
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1946
DocketNo. 6267; Entry No. W-142
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 339 (United States v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 16 Cust. Ct. 339, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 466 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Cole, Judge:

This case concerns the proper dutiable value of cigars exported from Cuba in September 1944 and entered at the port of Miami, Fla., in October 1944.

At the hearing in Miami on February 28, 1946, the parties submitted the appeal on a stipulation, agreeing that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise, such or similar cigars were freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Cuba, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, at the following values, [340]*340the prices for home consumption of such or similar merchandise being-no higher:

Consular invoice No. Item, Value (per thousand>

379_ 3,000 Med. Coronas 25’s $99

379.. 3,000 Petit de Lis 25’s. _ 84

385_ 2,500 Londres 50’s_ 75

385_ 1,000 Petit de Lis 50’s__ 80

385_ 1,000 Cremas 50’s_ 115

385_ 1,000 Med. Coronas 50’s 95

385_ 500 Especiales 25’s_ 119

385_ 500 Nacionales 50’s_ 125

380_ 2,000 Londres 50’s_ 75

380_ 2,000 Panetelas 50’s_ 75

380_ 2,000 Petit de Lis 50’s_— 80

380_ 1,000 Petit de Lis 25’s__ 84

380_ 2,000 Med. Coronas 50’s 95

380_ 1,000 Med. Coronas 25’s. 99

All of the foregoing prices are net, packed.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. 1940 ed § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for appraisement of the cigars in question, and that such statutory-values are those hereinabove set forth for the items enumerated.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. United States
19 Cust. Ct. 164 (U.S. Customs Court, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cust. Ct. 339, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-railway-express-agency-inc-cusc-1946.