United States v. Rafael Esquivel-Castaneda
This text of 548 F. App'x 420 (United States v. Rafael Esquivel-Castaneda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Rafael Esquivel-Castaneda appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 12-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for bringing in illegal aliens without presentation and aiding and abetting, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Esquivel-Castaneda contends that the district court erred by imposing a two-level increase for using a minor to commit the crime under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.4. We review for clear error. See United States v. Preciado, 506 F.3d 808, 810 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam). The district court did not clearly err in finding that Esquivel-Cas-taneda affirmatively used his children in his crime. See id. (evidence that defendant “brought children along to a previously planned crime supports a finding that the minors were used to avoid detection”).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
548 F. App'x 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rafael-esquivel-castaneda-ca9-2013.