United States v. Radermacher
295 F. App'x 85
Opinion
Order
After a limited remand under United States v. Taylor, 522 F.3d 731 (7th Cir. 2008), the district judge informed us that she would have imposed a lower sentence had she known about the extent of her discretion under Kimbrough v. United States, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007).
[86]*86Given this conclusion, the prejudice component of plain-error review has been established. The sentence is vacated, and the case is remanded for resentencing in light of Kimbrough.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Radermacher, 295 F. App'x 85 (7th Cir. 2008).
295 F. App'x 85 (United States v. Radermacher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kimbrough v. United States
552 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Taylor
522 F.3d 731 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)