United States v. Rackley
This text of 108 F. App'x 448 (United States v. Rackley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it found that defendant violated a condition of his supervised release by engaging in sexual conduct with a minor. A.R.S. § 13-1405; see United States v. Verduzco, 330 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir.2003). The record contains sufficient evidence to support the finding that defen[449]*449dant and the minor engaged in sexual intercourse as defined by A.R.S. § 13-1401(3).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
108 F. App'x 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rackley-ca9-2004.