United States v. Rachel Tucker
This text of 36 F.3d 1101 (United States v. Rachel Tucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
36 F.3d 1101
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Rachel TUCKER, Appellant.
No. 94-1226.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: September 12, 1994.
Filed: September 30, 1994.
Before Hansen, Circuit Judge, Henley, Senior Circuit Judge, and Morris Sheppard Arnold, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
In April, 1993, we remanded this case "for proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court" that had been filed two months earlier. That opinion directed the district court to "impos[e] ... a sentence of 72 months incarceration." United States v. Tucker, 986 F.2d 278, 280 (8th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 76 (1993). On remand, the district court did so.
We have considered the arguments offered on appeal of that sentence. We affirm the judgment of the district court.1 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F.3d 1101, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33514, 1994 WL 529866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-rachel-tucker-ca8-1994.