United States v. Rachel Robles

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Rachel Robles

443 F.2d 1368, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8844

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 20, 1971

Docket26400

StatusPublished

This text of 443 F.2d 1368 (United States v. Rachel Robles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Rachel Robles, 443 F.2d 1368, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8844 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The unlawful smuggling activities in which the appellant was found to have conspired are reviewed in United States v. Estrada, 441 F.2d 873 (9th Cir. 1971).

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, as we are required to do, we cannot say that it was insufficient to support the determination of guilt made by the district judge.

We are not persuaded, in the circumstances of this case, that there was such inordinate delay between the time of the commission of the offense and the times of arrest and trial as to have required the District Court to dismiss the indictment. Cf. United States v. Walton, 411 F.2d 283 (9th Cir. 1969); Benson v. United States, 402 F.2d 576 (9th Cir. 1968); Woody v. United States, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 192, 370 F.2d 214 (1966).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI