United States v. Rachel Alaffa Jernigan
474 F.3d 1149, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1409, 2007 WL 223166
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Rachel Alaffa Jernigan. Read the opinion of the Court — 451 F.3d 1027 →
Opinion
*1150 ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Rachel Alaffa Jernigan, 474 F.3d 1149, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1409, 2007 WL 223166 (9th Cir. 2007).
474 F.3d 1149 (United States v. Rachel Alaffa Jernigan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Albert Lamont Hector, United States of America v. Albert Lamont Hector
474 F.3d 1150 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)