United States v. R. Camacho-Carranza
This text of 230 F. App'x 638 (United States v. R. Camacho-Carranza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rigoberto Camacho-Carranza pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after having been deported following a conviction for a felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). The district court 1 sentenced him to 21 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release.
On appeal, Camacho-Carranza’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). For reversal, counsel suggests that the district court erred in not crediting Camacho-Carranza for time he had served in state and immigration custody. This argument fails. See United States v. Iversen, 90 F.3d 1340, 1344-45 (8th Cir.1996) (district court does not have authority to credit defendant for time served; such claim should be presented in first instance to Bureau of Prisons). We have also reviewed the record independently for any nonfrivolous issues, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), and we have found none.
Accordingly, we affirm. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 F. App'x 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-r-camacho-carranza-ca8-2007.