United States v. Quiroga-Zarate
This text of 305 F. App'x 465 (United States v. Quiroga-Zarate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Valdamero Quiroga-Zarate appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He contends that the waiver of appeal set forth in his plea agreement violated his right to due process because he could not knowingly and intelligently waive his right to appeal a sentence that had not yet been imposed. As Quiroga-Zarate acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Cope, 527 F.3d 944, 949 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 321, 172 L.Ed.2d 232 (2008).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-quiroga-zarate-ca9-2008.