United States v. Quiroga-Ramirez

223 F. App'x 327
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 15, 2007
Docket05-41478
StatusUnpublished

This text of 223 F. App'x 327 (United States v. Quiroga-Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Quiroga-Ramirez, 223 F. App'x 327 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Cesar Quiroga-Ramirez (Quiroga) appeals the 70-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms but less than 1000 kilograms of marijuana. He contends that the district court erred in imposing a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c) based on a finding that he was a leader or supervisor in the conspiracy. We have reviewed the record and determine that the district court did not clearly err in imposing the enhancement. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 & n. 9 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 268, 163 L.Ed.2d 241 (2005); United States v. Ronning, 47 F.3d 710, 711 (5th Cir.1995).

Quiroga also asserts that the district court erred in including 321 kilograms of marijuana found at a stash house in the base offense level. He contends that the Government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he engaged in a conspiracy involving those drugs. However, in light of Quiroga’s guilty plea to a drug conspiracy, the Government was required to show at sentencing that the marijuana at the stash house was “part of the same course of conduct or common scheme or plan as the offense of conviction.” U.S.S.G. § lB1.3(a)(2). We have reviewed the record and determine that the evidence in the presentence report is sufficient to warrant the finding of relevant conduct. See United States v. Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 247 (5th Cir.2005); United States v. De Jesus-Batres, 410 F.3d 154, 164 (5th Cir.2005), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1020, 163 L.Ed.2d 865 (2006). The judgment of the district court is thus AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ronning
47 F.3d 710 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. De Jesus-Batres
410 F.3d 154 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Villanueva
408 F.3d 193 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Betancourt
422 F.3d 240 (Fifth Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
223 F. App'x 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-quiroga-ramirez-ca5-2007.