United States v. Quintero
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Miguel Quintero has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Quintero has filed a response. His motion for an order directing counsel to supply the record is DENIED. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Quintero’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for [270]*270appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
577 F. App'x 269 (United States v. Quintero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.