United States v. Quintero
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-41470
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus LUIS DONALD QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-96-CV-82
- - - - - - - - - -
February 10, 1999
Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*
PER CURIAM:** Luis Donald Quintero, federal inmate #62583-079, moves this court for a certificate of appealability (COA) from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction, sua sponte if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite for the exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v. Carr, 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992).
*
This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).
**
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 97-41470
-2-
Quintero did not timely notice his appeal from the district
court’s judgment of dismissal of his § 2255 motion, and we are without jurisdiction to consider this case. See Carr, 979 F.2d at 55. Accordingly, the motion for a COA is DENIED, and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Quintero (United States v. Quintero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.