United States v. QUINTANILLAMEJIA

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals·Decided January 21, 2026·No. 202500236·Published

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before

DALY, GROSS, and BURGTORF Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Joe I. QUINTANILLAMEJIA Lance Corporal (E-3), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 202500236

Decided: 21 January 2026

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judges:

David C. Segraves (arraignment and motions) Todd J. Gaston (trial and entry of judgment)

Sentence adjudged 28 March 2025 by a special court-martial tried at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, California, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 118 days, and a bad-conduct discharge. 1

For Appellant:

Lieutenant Meggie C. Kane-Cruz, JAGC, USN

1 Appellant was credited with 118 days of pretrial confinement credit.

United States v. Quintanillamejia, NMCCA No. 202500236 Opinion of the Court

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. QUINTANILLAMEJIA, (N.M. 2026).

United States v. QUINTANILLAMEJIA (United States v. QUINTANILLAMEJIA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 859
10 U.S.C. § 859