United States v. Quinceno-Montoya
Opinion
Opinions of the United
2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
6-7-2005
USA v. Quinceno-Montoya Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential
Docket No. 04-1299
Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005
Recommended Citation "USA v. Quinceno-Montoya" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 926. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/926
This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No.: 04-1299
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee
v.
VICTOR HUGO QUICENO MONTOYA Appellant
On Appeal from Final Judgement of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey Submitted: March 8, 2005
Before: NYGAARD, McKEE and RENDELL, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Opinion filed in this case on June 1, 2005,
be amended as follows:
On page 4, delete the sentence beginning “The letter declares Montoya’s innocense . . . .” and replace it with “The letter declares Montoya’s innocence . . . .”
On Page 6, delete “Montes-Lenya” and replace with “Montes-Leyva.” On that same page, delete the sentence “However, that evidence would ‘if anything . . . a possible discrepancy.’ A109,” and replace with “However, that evidence would ‘if anything . . . present[] a possible discrepancy.’ A125.”. Again, on the same page, delete “. . . was guilty as charged.’ Id.,” and replace with “. . . was guilty as charged.’ A 109.”
On page 7, delete the following sentence from the Opinion: “However, it is now clear that the court could not rely upon that drug quantity to increase
Montoya’s sentence unless he admitted it, or the quantity was proven beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury.”
BY THE COURT
/s/ Theodore A. McKee Circuit Judge
Dated: June 7, 2005 CMH/cc: BPR, SGC, DBL, GSL
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Quinceno-Montoya (United States v. Quinceno-Montoya) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.