United States v. Quimby
71 U.S. 408, 18 L. Ed. 397, 4 Wall. 408, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 889
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The case falls within the construction of the treaty in the case of the United States v. Hathaway.
The article, we think, is chargeable with a duty of twenty per centum ad valorem, under the twenty-fourth section of the act of March 2d, 1861, which imposes this duty “ on all articles manufactured, in whole or in part,” not otherwise provided for.
The court answer the question, in the certificate of division of opinion,
In the aeeiRMAtive.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Quimby, 71 U.S. 408, 18 L. Ed. 397, 4 Wall. 408, 1866 U.S. LEXIS 889 (1867).
71 U.S. 408 (United States v. Quimby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Light v. Schmidt
269 N.W.2d 304 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1978)
Shore Fishery, Inc. v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Commission
21 A.2d 634 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1941)
Brea Canon Oil Co. v. Commissioner
29 B.T.A. 1134 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1934)
State v. American Sugar Refining Co.
108 La. 603 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1902)