United States v. Queen
This text of 575 F. App'x 195 (United States v. Queen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Nicholas James Queen, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motions for new trial, to amend, for reconsideration of the court’s January 28, 2013, order, and for relief from the court’s May 8, 1997, order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Queen, No. 1:93-cr-00366-WMN-1 (D.Md. Feb. 11, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
575 F. App'x 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-queen-ca4-2014.