United States v. Queen

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Queen

301 F. App'x 268

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2008·No. No. 08-6710·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [269]*269contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal [269]*269contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Queen, 301 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

301 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Queen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related