United States v. Queen
This text of United States v. Queen (United States v. Queen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6710
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, JR., a/k/a Fat Sammy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:93- cr-00369-AMD-1)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Queen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-queen-ca4-2008.