United States v. Queen

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 26, 2008
Docket08-6710
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Queen (United States v. Queen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Queen, (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SAMUEL ROBERT QUEEN, JR., a/k/a Fat Sammy,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (1:93- cr-00369-AMD-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 26, 2008

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel Robert Queen, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals

the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Queen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-queen-ca4-2008.