United States v. Quarterman
This text of United States v. Quarterman (United States v. Quarterman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before HITESMAN, GASTON, and ATTANASIO, Appellate Military Judges
_________________________
UNITED STATES Appellee
v.
Mikhail C. QUARTERMAN Aircrew Survival Equipmentman Technician (E-3), U.S. Navy Appellant
No. 201900207
Decided: 11 March 2020.
Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary.
Military Judge: Michael J. Luken
Sentence adjudged 2 May 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Station, Norfolk, Virginia, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sen- tence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1, confinement for 7 months and a bad-conduct discharge. 1
For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC, USN.
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.
1 Pursuant to a pretrial agreement, the convening authority suspended the bad-conduct
discharge and confinement in excess of 6 months. United States v. Quarterman, NMCCA No. 201900207
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
PER CURIAM: After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866. The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT:
RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Quarterman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-quarterman-nmcca-2020.