United States v. Quantrelle D. Green

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Quantrelle D. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 368 F. App'x 40
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 13, 2007·No. 06-12946·Unpublished

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MARCH 13, 2007 No. 06-12946 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-60310-CR-CMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

QUANTRELLE D. GREEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________

(March 13, 2007)

Before DUBINA, CARNES and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mark Graham Hanson, counsel for Quantrelle Donte Green, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant

to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Green’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Quantrelle D. Green, (11th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Quantrelle D. Green (United States v. Quantrelle D. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)