United States v. Quantity of Rags

27 F. Cas. 638, 77 Int. Rev. Rec. 123
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BENEDICT, District Judge,

held, that under section 4S of the internal revenue law, the juxtaposition of the property proceeded against in the same place, or within the same enclosure with the illicit still, was sufficient to forfeit it; provided the owners of the property knew of the existence of the illicit still in the rear stable, and that under the evidence in the case the jury would not be warranted in finding that the existence of the illicit still was unknown to the owner of the place and the keeper of the livery stable. A verdict was accordingly directed in favor of the government.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Quantity of Rags, 27 F. Cas. 638, 77 Int. Rev. Rec. 123 (circtsdny 1868).

27 F. Cas. 638 (United States v. Quantity of Rags) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. One Machine for Corking Bottles
267 F. 501 (W.D. Washington, 1920)