United States v. Pyne

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Pyne

353 F. App'x 798

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2009·No. No. 09-7250·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Pyne appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his motion for continued recusal and disqualification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Pyne, No. 8:04-cr-00018-AW-3 (D. Md. June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Pyne appeals the district court’s order summarily denying his motion for continued recusal and disqualification. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Pyne, No. 8:04-cr-00018-AW-3 (D. Md. June 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Pyne, 353 F. App'x 798 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

353 F. App'x 798 (United States v. Pyne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.