United States v. Pymm
This text of United States v. Pymm (United States v. Pymm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-40350 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
TRECIA M. PYMM
Defendant - Appellant
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:99-CR-131-1 -------------------- October 10, 2000
Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Trecia M. Pymm appeals the district court’s order that she
make restitution to the Texas Department of Human Services in the
amount of $21,115.88. She contends that the total restitution
amount, although not the schedule of payments, is erroneous. She
argues that the restitution amount should be limited to $3956.32,
the amount set forth the in counts 5 through 9 of indictment.
The Government clarifies in this court that in the plea agreement
it intended to limit the total amount of restitution to $3956.32,
the amount set forth in the indictment. See United States v.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-40350 -2-
Arnold, 947 F.2d 1236, 1237-38 (5th Cir. 1991); United States v.
Stout, 32 F.3d 901, 904-05 (5th Cir. 1994).
Thus, that portion of the judgment ordering that Pymm pay a
total of $21,115.88 in restitution is VACATED and the case
REMANDED for resentencing as to the amount of restitution
ordered. The judgment of the district court otherwise is
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Pymm, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pymm-ca5-2000.