United States v. Pugh

97 F. App'x 490
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2004
Docket03-31027
StatusUnpublished

This text of 97 F. App'x 490 (United States v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pugh, 97 F. App'x 490 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

David Brian Pugh pleaded guilty to one conspiracy charge and one fraud charge. The district court upwardly departed at sentencing and sentenced Pugh to 96 months in prison and a three-year term of supervised release. Pugh now appeals his sentence, arguing only that the extent of the district court’s departure was unreasonable. Because Pugh challenges only the extent of the district court’s departure, we need not analyze the recent changes to review of upward departures set out in amended 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e). See United States v. Lee, 358 F.3d 315, 326-29 (5th Cir.2004). Rather, we need only consider whether the extent of the departure was reasonable. See Williams v. United States, 503 U.S. 193, 203, 112 S.Ct. 1112, 117 L.Ed.2d 341 (1992); United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc).

A review of this court’s jurisprudence controverts Pugh’s arguments and shows that the extent of the district court’s departure, although substantial, was not unreasonable. See United States v. Daughenbaugh, 49 F.3d 171, 173-74 (5th Cir.1995); Ashburn, 38 F.3d at 806; United States v. Rosogie, 21 F.3d 632, 633 (5th Cir.1994). Accordingly, there is no abuse of discretion, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Lee
358 F.3d 315 (Fifth Circuit, 2004)
Williams v. United States
503 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1992)
United States v. Philip Scott Ashburn
38 F.3d 803 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Charles Arthur Daughenbaugh
49 F.3d 171 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 F. App'x 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pugh-ca5-2004.