United States v. Pugh

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 1998
Docket97-7535
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Pugh (United States v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Pugh, (4th Cir. 1998).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7535

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES TYRONE PUGH, a/k/a Tyke,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CR-93-43, CA-96-194-5)

Submitted: January 6, 1998 Decided: January 20, 1998

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Tyrone Pugh, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel Gerald Nazzaro, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Lisa Grimes Johnston, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Pugh, No. CR-93-43; CA-96-194-5 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Pugh, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pugh-ca4-1998.