United States v. Pugh

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Pugh

309 F. App'x 328

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 29, 2009

DocketNo. 08-12772

StatusPublished

This text of 309 F. App'x 328 (United States v. Pugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Pugh, 309 F. App'x 328 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Brent L. Pugh, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Pugh’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William Gregory Hughes, appointed counsel for Brent L. Pugh, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Pugh’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

309 F. App'x 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pugh-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack