United States v. Psaki

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

United States v. Psaki

181 F. 635, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5603

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 181 F. 635 (United States v. Psaki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Psaki, 181 F. 635, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5603 (circtsdny 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The action is upon a bond given upon importation of certain merchandise. Some of the packages were sent to the public store to be opened and examined; the remaining packages were delivered to the importers upon their giving the bond in question. Its condition is that the obligors “shall, within ten days after the package or packages designated by the collector and sent to the public store to be opened and examined have been appraised and reported to him, be returned upon demand to the order of the collector without having been opened.” The complaint avers that defendants did not return upon demand, etc., but is silent as to whether or not the. demand was made within the 10 days.

There is no breach of the bond unless the 10 days elapse without compliance being had with a demand for a return. Failure to demand within the 10 days is not a defense, as was suggested on the argument; demand and disobedience thereof must be shown to establish a breach. If the pleader had set forth the facts, viz., that the goods were appraised and reported on such a date, that demand was made on such a date, and that such demand had not been complied with, he would have stated his case with a specificness which it now lacks.

The demurrer is sustained, with leave to amend the complaint within 10 days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The action is upon a bond given upon importation of certain merchandise. Some of the packages were sent to the public store to be opened and examined; the remaining packages were delivered to the importers upon their giving the bond in question. Its condition is that the obligors “shall, within ten days after the package or packages designated by the collector and sent to the public store to be opened and examined have been appraised and reported to him, be returned upon demand to the order of the collector without having been opened.” The complaint avers that defendants did not return upon demand, etc., but is silent as to whether or not the. demand was made within the 10 days.

There is no breach of the bond unless the 10 days elapse without compliance being had with a demand for a return. Failure to demand within the 10 days is not a defense, as was suggested on the argument; demand and disobedience thereof must be shown to establish a breach. If the pleader had set forth the facts, viz., that the goods were appraised and reported on such a date, that demand was made on such a date, and that such demand had not been complied with, he would have stated his case with a specificness which it now lacks.

The demurrer is sustained, with leave to amend the complaint within 10 days.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 F. 635, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-psaki-circtsdny-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack