United States v. Provance
This text of 4 M.J. 819 (United States v. Provance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Army Court of Military Review primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION OF THE COURT
This ease is before the Court for mandatory review pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866.
Appellant was tried by special court-martial before a military judge alone for stealing $850.00 and a stereo receiver of a value of $313.00. Pursuant to his pleas, he was found guilty of wrongful appropriation of $850.00 and stealing the stereo receiver in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 921). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for five months, and forfeiture of $240.00 pay per month for six months. The convening authority affirmed only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad-conduct discharge and confinement at hard labor for 70 days.
During the sentence portion of appellant’s trial the trial counsel offered and the military judge admitted, as prosecution exhibits, records of two Article 15 punishments. The appellate defense counsel alleges that these two prosecution exhibits consisting of non judicial punishment were improperly admitted into evidence based on the recent Court of Military Appeals ease of United States v. Booker.
Accordingly, the findings of guilty and the sentence are AFFIRMED.
COOK, Judge, concurs in the results only.
3 M.J. 443 (C.M.A.1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 M.J. 819, 1978 CMR LEXIS 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-provance-usarmymilrev-1978.