United States v. Proctor
This text of United States v. Proctor (United States v. Proctor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-11007 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARTHUR E. PROCTOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CR-54-D-8 - - - - - - - - - - April 7, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Arthur Proctor appeals his guilty plea and sentence
following a conviction for owning, maintaining, and controlling
an automobile chop shop. His argument that his guilty plea was
not knowing and voluntary because of “subsequent substance abuse
findings” is unavailing. See Jackson v. United States, 512 F.2d
772, 773 (5th Cir. 1975). The district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying Proctor’s motion to withdraw his guilty
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 97-11007 -2-
plea. See United States v. Grant, 117 F.3d 788, 789 (5th Cir. 1997).
Proctor has waived his right to contest issues regarding the
calculation of his sentence and restitution through a knowing and
voluntary appeal waiver made in his plea agreement. See United
States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 567-68 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Proctor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-proctor-ca5-1998.