United States v. Prieto

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 4, 2002
Docket01-11153
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Prieto (United States v. Prieto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Prieto, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-11153 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

WILFREDO PRIETO

Defendant - Appellant

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-239-23-A and USDC No. 4:01-CR-88-1-A - - - - - - - - - - March 1, 2002

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wilfredo Prieto appeals from his sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction for two counts of possession with intent

to distribute approximately 43.6 pounds of a substance containing

marijuana. He argues that the district court erred by increasing

his sentence for obstruction of justice and by failing to

decrease his sentence for acceptance of responsibility.

Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities

convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-11153 -2-

district court did not clearly err by holding that Prieto

warranted application of the obstruction-of-justice adjustment.

See United States v. Upton, 91 F.3d 677, 687 (5th Cir. 1996).

The district court also did not err by holding that Prieto did

not warrant an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. See

United States v. Lujan-Sauceda, 187 F.3d 451, 451-52 (5th Cir.

1999). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Prieto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-prieto-ca5-2002.