United States v. Price

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Price. Read the opinion of the Court — 36 F. App'x 156
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 25, 2002·No. 02-6773·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6773

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

THOMAS JEFFERSON PRICE, III, a/k/a Thomas Price,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-104, CA-01-61-1)

Submitted: July 18, 2002 Decided: July 25, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Jefferson Price, III, Appellant Pro Se. David Paul Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Thomas Jefferson Price, III, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Price, Nos. CR-

98-104; CA-01-61-1 (M.D.N.C. May 2, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Price, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Price (United States v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related