United States v. Prescott
27 F. Cas. 616, 2 Dill. 405
Opinion
It is our opinion that the evidence offered is not competent. The general rule certainly is that evidence given or statements made by a party under compulsion or order of court tending to criminate himself cannot be put in evidence on a criminal proceeding against him. Reg. v. Garbett, 1 Denison, Crown Cas. 236. This ease falls within this principle. Evidence excluded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Prescott, 27 F. Cas. 616, 2 Dill. 405 (circtdmn 1872).
27 F. Cas. 616 (United States v. Prescott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.