United States v. Prescott

401 F. App'x 460
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 27, 2010·No. No. 10-11093·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A. Fitzgerald Hall, appointed counsel for Phillip Karl Prescott, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguably meritorious issues, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Prescott’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Prescott, 401 F. App'x 460 (11th Cir. 2010).

401 F. App'x 460 (United States v. Prescott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)