United States v. Prescod

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2011·No. 10-7517·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7517

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM ALFRED PRESCOD, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00029-RLV-1)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Alfred Prescod, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Alfred Prescod, Jr., appeals the district

court’s order denying his various post-conviction motions. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Prescod, No. 5:99-cr-00029-RLV-1

(W.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Prescod, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. Prescod (United States v. Prescod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.