United States v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div. UAC

U.S. Customs Court

United States v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div. UAC

38 Cust. Ct. 651

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedMay 10, 1957

DocketReap. Dec. 8798; Entry Nos. H-6; H-17; H-18; H-35

StatusPublished

This text of 38 Cust. Ct. 651 (United States v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div. UAC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Pratt & Whitney Aircraft Div. UAC, 38 Cust. Ct. 651 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

OlivbR, Chief Judge:

These four appeals for reappraisement relate

to certain aircraft engine parts exported from Canada and entered at the port of Hartford, Conn.

The cases are before me on an agreed set of facts that establish cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question and that such statutory value for each of the items is the invoice unit price, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OlivbR, Chief Judge:

These four appeals for reappraisement relate

to certain aircraft engine parts exported from Canada and entered at the port of Hartford, Conn.

The cases are before me on an agreed set of facts that establish cost of production, as defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question and that such statutory value for each of the items is the invoice unit price, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Cust. Ct. 651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-pratt-whitney-aircraft-div-uac-cusc-1957.