United States v. Prasse
This text of 450 F.2d 946 (United States v. Prasse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
450 F.2d 946
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Ernest Lee JOHNSON, Appellant,
v.
Arthur T. PRASSE, Commissioner of Correction, Alfred T.
Rundle, Superintendent of Correction, State
Correctional Institution, Graterford,
Pa., Appellees.
No. 18493.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 27, 1971.
Decided Oct. 18, 1971.
Ernest Lee Johnson, pro se.
Dante Mattioni, Asst. Atty. Gen., Philadelphia, Pa. (J. Shane Creamer, Atty. Gen., Herbert Monheit, Asst. Atty. Gen. by Larry Elliot Jones, Asst. Atty. Gen., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, HASTIE, Circuit Judge, and HERMAN, District Judge.
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
The district court properly decided that the present complaint by a state prisoner charging prison authorities with negligence in the matter of providing him with needed medical treatment does not state a cause of action under the Civil Rights Act. Cf. Commonwealth ex rel. Gatewood v. Hendrick, 3d Cir. 1967, 368 F.2d 179; Kent v. Prasse, W.D.Pa. 1967, 265 F.Supp. 673, aff'd. per curiam, 3d Cir. 1967, 385 F.2d 406.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 F.2d 946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-prasse-ca3-1971.