United States v. Powell
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10384 (Summary Calendar) __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEREMIAH POWELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 4:94-CR-126-A) - - - - - - - - - -
May 17, 1996
Before GARWOOD, WIENER and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jeremiah Powell appeals his conviction for possession of
marijuana with intent to distribute. He contends that district
court impermissibly limited the scope of cross-examination and that
the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. Our
review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us
that no reversible error was committed. The court's limitation of
repetitive cross-examination did not rise to the level of plain
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. error. See United States v. Coleman, 997 F.2d 1101, 1105 (5th Cir.
1993), cert. denied, 114 S. Ct. 893 (1994). The evidence was
sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Powell guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt. See United States v. Pennington, 20 F.3d 593,
597 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Powell (United States v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.