United States v. Powell

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: February 23, 2007
• Docket: 06-7787
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7787

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FLOYD JUNIOR POWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:99-cr-00012-6; 5:02-cv-00138)

Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 23, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Junior Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, William A. Brafford, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Floyd Junior Powell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to stay the sale of forfeited real property. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Powell, No. 5:99-cr-00012-6 (W.D.N.C.

Oct. 2, 2006). We deny Powell’s motions for release, for summary

judgment, and to dismiss the Appellee’s motion to enlarge time. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -