United States v. Powell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Powell. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 F. App'x 290
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2003·No. 03-6191·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6191

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

QUINCY DEMOND POWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-00-52)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Quincy Demond Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Quincy Demond Powell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for discovery

under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis in this court and dismiss on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Powell, No. CR-00-52 (W.D. Va. Jan. 27,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Powell, (4th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Powell (United States v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.