United States v. Powell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6191
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
QUINCY DEMOND POWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CR-00-52)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 23, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quincy Demond Powell, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Quincy Demond Powell appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for discovery
under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma
pauperis in this court and dismiss on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Powell, No. CR-00-52 (W.D. Va. Jan. 27,
2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Powell (United States v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.