United States v. Pouk Kang

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 20, 2026·No. 25-1453·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 25-1453 ___________________________

United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Pouk Kang Kang

Defendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________

Submitted: April 13, 2026 Filed: July 20, 2026 [Unpublished] ____________

Before KELLY, ARNOLD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Pouk Kang Kang was charged with one count of possession of a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing § 922(g)(1) violates his right to possess firearms under the Second Amendment. The district court 1 denied the motion, finding Kang’s arguments foreclosed by this circuit’s precedent. Kang then entered a conditional guilty plea, reserving the right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss.

On appeal, Kang asserts that the class of individuals who are prohibited from possessing a firearm due to a prior felony conviction is too broad, contending that some modern-day felonies involve significantly less serious conduct than crimes recognized at the time the Second Amendment was ratified. However, to adopt this argument would be to require an assessment of each prior felony conviction, and we have held that “there is no need for felony-by-felony litigation regarding the constitutionality of § 922(g)(1).” United States v. Jackson, 110 F.4th 1120, 1125 (8th Cir. 2024). Kang also argues that a permanent or lifetime ban on the ability to possess a firearm is facially unconstitutional, but we have held to the contrary. United States v. Bernard, 136 F.4th 762, 765 (8th Cir. 2025) (describing Jackson as holding “that the permanent prohibition of § 922(g)(1) is indeed constitutional”).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Pouk Kang, (8th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Pouk Kang (United States v. Pouk Kang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Edell Jackson
110 F.4th 1120 (Eighth Circuit, 2024)
United States v. Jae Bernard
136 F.4th 762 (Eighth Circuit, 2025)