United States v. Potts

9 U.S. 284, 3 L. Ed. 102, 5 Cranch 284, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 432
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 9 U.S. 284 (United States v. Potts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Potts, 9 U.S. 284, 3 L. Ed. 102, 5 Cranch 284, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 432 (1809).

Opinion

March 7.

Marshall^ Ch. J.

• delivered the opinion of the court to the following effect:

The opinion of this court is, that copper plates turned up at the edge are exempt Irom duty, al *287 though imported under the denomination of raised bottoms.

'It appears to have been the policy of the United Stales to distinguish between raw and manufactured copper. From the facts stated, the copper in questioncannot be deemed manufactured copper within the intention of the legislature.

The opinion certified to the court below was, that round copper bottoms turned up aUthe edge are not iiabie to the payment ot duty within the meaning the stveral acts of congress.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. McDowell
N.D. California, 2020
Wills v. United States
E.D. Tennessee, 2020
Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United States
116 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (Court of International Trade, 2000)
Altieri v. United States
50 Cust. Ct. 197 (U.S. Customs Court, 1963)
National Maritime Union of America v. Herzog
78 F. Supp. 146 (District of Columbia, 1948)
Walling v. Armbruster
51 F. Supp. 166 (W.D. Arkansas, 1943)
Ishimitsu v. United States
11 Ct. Cust. 186 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1921)
In re I. Rheinstrom & Sons Co.
207 F. 119 (E.D. Kentucky, 1913)
Western Union Tel. Co. v. Myatt
98 F. 335 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas, 1899)
Patton v. United States
159 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 1895)
City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Coffee Co.
46 La. Ann. 86 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1894)
Hartranft v. Wiegmann
121 U.S. 609 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Bank of St. Mary's v. State
12 Ga. 475 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 U.S. 284, 3 L. Ed. 102, 5 Cranch 284, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-potts-scotus-1809.