United States v. Posey
This text of United States v. Posey (United States v. Posey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-51189 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LISTON RANDOLPH POSEY, II,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-93-CR-84-ALL -------------------- April 9, 2001
Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Liston Randolph Posey, II, federal prisoner # 02528-095,
appeals the district court’s denial of his “Rule 35 Motion for
Correction of Plain Error.” Posey argues that: (1) the
forfeiture of his firearms violated his double jeopardy rights;
(2) his sentence should be vacated in view of Apprendi v. New
Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000); (3) because the indictment did not
allege the quantity of marijuana, his conviction must be vacated
with prejudice to subsequent prosecution in view of Apprendi; and
(4) the district court erred in stating that this court affirmed
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-51189 -2-
in part and reversed in part in United States v. Posey, 217 F.3d
282 (5th Cir. 2000). The only relief that Posey sought in his
motion was an order vacating his conviction and sentence. The
district court did not have jurisdiction to grant the relief that
Posey sought as it was beyond the scope of this court’s remand
for return of Posey’s property. See United States v. Hass, 199
F.3d 749, 752 (5th Cir. 1999). Therefore, the district court did
not err in denying Posey’s motion. The Government’s motion to
dismiss Posey’s appeal is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; ALL OTHER
OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Posey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-posey-ca5-2001.