United States v. Portillo-Aguirre

311 F.3d 647
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Portillo-Aguirre. Read the opinion of the Court — 311 F.3d 647
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2003·No. 01-50476·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 6, 2003

For the Fifth Circuit Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 01-50476

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REYNALDO PORTILLO-AGUIRRE Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Pecos Division

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Opinion 311 F.3d 647

(5th Cir. Nov. 1, 2002)

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Treating the petition for rehearing en banc as a petition for panel rehearing, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor (FED. R. APP. P. 35 and 5TH CIR. R.

35), the petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

THE MANDATE SHALL ISSUE FORTHWITH.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Portillo-Aguirre, 311 F.3d 647 (5th Cir. 2003).

311 F.3d 647 (United States v. Portillo-Aguirre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.