United States v. Porter

27 F. Cas. 597, 2 U.S. 345, 2 Dall. 345
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1795
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 27 F. Cas. 597 (United States v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Porter, 27 F. Cas. 597, 2 U.S. 345, 2 Dall. 345 (circtdpa 1795).

Opinion

The only occurrence, therefore, which it is material to notice on this trial, was the following: There were two of the petty jury (Thomas Coates and William Callady) who being called, and not challenged, alledged sickness in excuse for not serving, and they were, for the present, set apart: But the whole pannel having been eventually drawn out of the balloting box, without furnishing twelve names unchallenged, and those jurors persevering in their excuse, the counsel for the prisoner retracted his challenge of another juror, who was, thereupon, qualified by order of THE COURT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bateman v. Morris
4 Ohio N.P. 397 (Clarke County Probate Court, 1897)
Vojta v. Pelikan
15 Mo. App. 471 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1884)
State v. Price
44 S.C.L. 351 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1857)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 F. Cas. 597, 2 U.S. 345, 2 Dall. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-porter-circtdpa-1795.