United States v. Porter
This text of 24 F. App'x 121 (United States v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Emjadia Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and his motion for reconsideration. Porter challenged his conviction and sentence under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review, the district court properly denied relief on this claim. United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.2001), pet. for cert. filed (Oct. 9, 2001) (No. 01-6715). We find that the district court properly found that Porter’s remaining claim was successive. In re Taylor, 171 F.3d 185, 187-88 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 F. App'x 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-porter-ca4-2001.