United States v. Porter

24 F. App'x 121
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 7, 2001
Docket01-6960
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 F. App'x 121 (United States v. Porter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Porter, 24 F. App'x 121 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Emjadia Porter seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and his motion for reconsideration. Porter challenged his conviction and sentence under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Because Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review, the district court properly denied relief on this claim. United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 151 (4th Cir.2001), pet. for cert. filed (Oct. 9, 2001) (No. 01-6715). We find that the district court properly found that Porter’s remaining claim was successive. In re Taylor, 171 F.3d 185, 187-88 (4th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. Nash
129 F. App'x 745 (Third Circuit, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. App'x 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-porter-ca4-2001.